Which of the following roles is responsible for enforcing Architecture Compliance?

The Architecture Board is primarily responsible for enforcing Architecture Compliance within an enterprise. This role involves establishing the governance framework for architecture, which includes setting policies, standards, and guidelines that align with the organization's architecture vision and principles. The Architecture Board ensures that all projects and initiatives are compliant with these established frameworks, thereby maintaining consistency and integrity across the architecture landscape.

In addition, the Architecture Board typically reviews architecture-related decisions, assesses compliance during different project phases, and provides the necessary guidance to stakeholders involved in the architecture process. It plays a critical role in managing risks associated with architectural decisions and ensuring that the overall architecture aligns with the strategic goals of the organization.

Other roles may contribute to or be aware of architectural compliance, but they do not hold the primary responsibility. For instance, the Project Leader may oversee the project implementation but is not specifically tasked with enforcing architecture compliance. Stakeholders might influence the requirements and outcomes of the architecture but are not responsible for the governance of compliance. The Development Team is focused on implementing solutions as per the architectures defined and validated by the Architecture Board, but its members do not dictate compliance themselves. Thus, the Architecture Board stands out as the definitive authority in maintaining architectural compliance within the organization.